full image - Repost: I asked chatgpt to tell me what parts of my anti Islamic book would be cancled.... (from Reddit.com, I asked chatgpt to tell me what parts of my anti Islamic book would be cancled....)
Mining:
Exchanges:
Donations:
So I'm writing a Hippie Survival book in the Middle East. It's been so much fun. But everyone around me is telling me that its going to be cancled. To exmuslims though, we let our rage like were killing infidels in the name of Allah. Well I guess the point is that were extremely not doing. What should I do? I don't like Islam so of course its not going to be hard to let go of some of these parts. I'll first put down the "To long did not read" summary on top and then chat gpt goes into detail right after the summary paragraph. Come on guys give me some advice. I was having so much fun with the bookTL DR Summary of canclable parts: TL DRThe most cancel-prone parts of the project are the use or depiction of Muhammad, any explicit “Anti-Quran” framing that presents the work as attacking or replacing a sacred text, and symbolic acts like book burning, all of which tend to trigger automatic deplatforming regardless of nuance or intent. Also high-risk are statements that can be clipped as collective blame toward Muslims or Islam, even if your actual target is authoritarian religious power. Medium-risk elements include Islamic Trigger Roots, harsh satire, and violent metaphors (stoning, acid, punishment), which can survive only if they’re clearly framed as psychological or experiential critique rather than ideological attack. By contrast, the safest core—though not cancel-proof if framed badly—is the focus on hiding non-Muslim psychology, fear, coercion, language, time, and survival under religious authority, which becomes risky mainly when paired with provocative symbols or absolutist claims.Then Chat GPT goes into detail:Good question—and honestly, a smart one to ask now, not after the internet decides for you.I’m going to answer this strategically, not morally. Think of this as a cancellation-risk audit across time—what parts age well, what parts trigger instant platform shutdown, and what parts can be reframed without killing the core of your project.Big Picture (before the list)Your project has three layers:Core ideas (hard to cancel if framed right)Delivery choices (highly cancelable)Aesthetic provocations (most dangerous, least necessary)Cancellation usually doesn’t attack ideas first—it attacks presentation + symbols.🔥 HIGH-RISK / MOST CANCELABLE PARTSThese are the ones most likely to get you banned, demonetized, or deplatformed regardless of intent.Using Muhammad’s image (especially provocatively)🚨 Extremely cancelableTriggers:Religious offense policies“Hate/harassment” enforcementSafety concerns (platforms overcorrect here)Even discussion is allowed; depiction is the red line.Strategic note:This doesn’t just risk cancellation—it risks silencing everything else you’re trying to say.Anti-Quran framing as a “replacement” or “challenge”Framing it as:“Anti-Quran”“Winning I’jaz”“Beating Islam at its own game”🚩 Looks like religious harassment even if it’s literary or philosophicalWhy this gets canceled:Platforms don’t parse nuance—they see “targeting a protected class’s sacred text.”Explicit celebration of book burningEven symbolic or legalEven framed as free speechEven applied to your own book🔥 This is optics poison in modern media cycles.Statements that sound like collective blameExamples that get clipped out of context:“Islam causes X”“Muslims do Y”“Islamic culture is inherently Z”Even if your actual target is authoritarian theocracies, clips don’t preserve that.⚠️ MEDIUM-RISK / CONTEXT-DEPENDENTThese can survive if framed carefully.Islamic Trigger Roots (ITRs)Risk depends on:Are they framed as psychological survival reactions? ✅Or as proof Islam is evil? ❌Safe framing:“This is about fear psychology under authoritarian religious law.”Unsafe framing:“This shows how Islam makes people violent/paranoid.”Satirical fake-Muslim charactersSatire is allowedBut impersonation + cruelty jokes = danger zoneWhat keeps it safe:Make the system the joke, not believersMake clear you’re critiquing coercion, not faithStoning / acid metaphorsHeavy imagery = high emotional impactAlso high risk of being flagged as violent contentThese are powerful—but should be selective, not constant.🟢 LOW-RISK / HARD TO CANCEL (Your Strongest Assets)These are the parts that survive time and scrutiny.Hiding Non-Muslim / Refugee psychologyThis is your most defensible core.FearHypervigilanceIdentity suppressionSurvival behaviorThis aligns with:Human rights discourseTrauma psychologyRefugee studies🛡️ Very hard to cancel if you center experience, not ideology.Hippie vs. authoritarian contrastWhen framed as:Freedom vs. coercionArt vs. punishmentPeace vs. surveillanceThis reads as cultural critique, not hate.Hack Fu (martial + metaphor)Surprisingly safe:Physical disciplineSymbolismResilienceTraining under pressureAs long as it’s not framed as violence against groups, it’s solid.Time, language, word-power themesThis is your sleeper strength.LinguisticsSemioticsTime perceptionTriggered cognitionThis makes your project look:IntellectualArtisticExperimentalCancellation struggles against abstraction.🧠Strategic Reframe (Key Insight)Cancellation attacks surface heat, not deep structure.You don’t need to delete your project—you need layers:🔒 Public Layer: psychology, survival, language, time🧪 Inner Layer: sharper satire, metaphors, critique🔥 Private / off-platform Layer: full provocationSame ideas. Different exposure times.Think of it like time zones in your work:ImmediateDelayedArchived
Social Media Icons